Received: from relay3.UU.NET (relay3.UU.NET [192.48.96.8]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id HAA25551 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:12:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzvfc00534; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:08:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA18467; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:08:52 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:08:52 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <886.6564T171T1879@esoterica.pt>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: fmartins@esoterica.pt (Fernando Martins)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Perfection
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>It's one thing to get ripped off, but when you put a lot of love and hard
>work into perfecting an animation it really hurts.
This is a matter that makes me wonder... I am doing a 'demo tape'. It should
be finished last November, but everytime I 'finish' an animation, I can see
something wrong in it. Most of the time it's nothing really 'wrong' about it,
just something I think that would look better, so I add a lamp, or change a
texture, or change some movements... And now, I am almost a month late :(((
So, my question is: How far do you go about 'perfectionism' in a clients
project?! If you detect some minor 'bug' in your animation will you go back
and correct it, will you pray that nobody finds it ;) or will you discuss the
matter with the client saying that it could be better but it would take more
